WATCH OUT FOR THE “PSYCHOPATHS” THE PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIST-REVISED (PCL-R)©

By Eric Marcy |   Dec. 16, 2016


CHALLENGING SO-CALLED "OBJECTIVE" TESTING

Read More

Topics : Mental Health, Criminal Law, Psychological Test, Parole, experts, Psychology | 0 Comments Read More

The Use And Abuse Of The LSI-R In Parole Evaluations Challenging So-Called "Objective" Testing

By Eric Marcy |   Apr. 15, 2015

The Erroneous Use of and Reliance on the LSI-R

The Level of Service Inventory-Revised “LSI-R” is frequently misused in the context of parole evaluations. Providing an air of scientific reliability, its application in the forensic setting is actually unreliable, subjective, and highly dependent on factors that may be decades old, failing to take into consideration, relevant facts relating to maturity and rehabilitation for which it is not designed to account. While there is authority that supports the efficacy of the LSI-R for determining security risk, classification, programming and custodial placement at the time of initial incarceration, the LSI-R was never designed for and is not appropriate to predict an inmate’s prognosis on parole after years of incarceration.

Read More

Topics : Scientific Evidence, Mental Health, Criminal Law, Psychological Test, discovery, Eric Marcy, Parole, Health Care | 0 Comments Read More

Challenging So-Called "Objective" Psychological Tests: The Use And Abuse Of Psychological Testing In Trials, Sentencing, Parole Consideration, And Custody Disputes

By Eric Marcy |   Apr. 1, 2015

Criminal and civil courts and the New Jersey State Parole Board have accepted the use of psychological testing as an important component of making legal and factual determinations in both the civil and criminal litigation and for considerations as to whether a person is suitable for release on parole. Such testing may add an air of scientific authority resulting in an over reliance on conclusions drawn from the instrument. While psychological testing does add value, the courts recognize and it must be emphasized that the ultimate determinations involving psychological issues reside with the court and/or fact finder. The “objective test” result and related “expert” opinion may be considered, but are not binding on the court and/or fact finder. Given the stakes in establishing defenses in criminal law, sentencing, whether someone may be returned to society in parole determinations, and family law custody disputes, counsel must understand the benefits and limitations of psychological testing in the forensic context.

Read More

Topics : Litigation, Scientific Evidence, Mental Health, Criminal Law, discovery, Parole, Health Care | 0 Comments Read More

    All Blog Posts

    Subscribe to Email Updates

    Featured Blogger

    Eric Marcy

    Eric Marcy

    Click Here to Read My Latest Blog Post

    Categories

    see all